Creative freedom will remain constrained and restrained till the individual is deprived of the right to express himself without restrictions, reasonable or otherwise
Is proper on the part of the State just because it feels that it can improve its financial resources, to take over any existing well-conducted private enterprise?
Is it possible to have freedom of expression which is not absolute? The answer is a big 'no.' Freedom of expression ought to be absolute - or it is no freedom at all.
Leaders of the socialist movement in India did not recognize the need for a liberal social and cultural context for the growth of a democratic socialist movement