Summary
In this letter dated February 27, 1970, M. R. Masani writes from Parliament House, New Delhi, to the Speaker of the Lok Sabha to object to the proposed scheduling of discussion on the Banks Nationalisation Ordinance and Bill. He argues that the General Budget debate, scheduled to begin on March 9, is a matter of greater national importance and should not be displaced by the bank-nationalisation debate.
Masani notes that the Ordinance was valid for six weeks—from February 14 to April 2—and therefore did not create an urgent scheduling problem. He requests that the General Budget debate begin immediately after miscellaneous business on March 9 and that discussion of the Banks Nationalisation Ordinance be postponed until the Budget debate has concluded. The page does not state the Speaker’s eventual response or the subsequent parliamentary outcome.
Key points
- Masani protests the Government’s proposed timing for discussion of the Banks Nationalisation Ordinance and Bill.
- He describes the General Budget debate as a matter of prime national importance.
- He argues that the bank-nationalisation discussion should not be allowed to displace or delay the Budget debate.
- He observes that the Ordinance remained valid for six weeks, from February 14 to April 2.
- He proposes that the Budget debate begin after miscellaneous business on March 9.
- He requests that discussion of the Banks Nationalisation Ordinance be taken up only after the General Budget debate concludes.
Metadata and summary are AI-extracted from the source PDF and reviewed for editorial accuracy. The original work is available via the Read PDF tab above (where present); paragraph-level citation inside the PDF is deferred to a future engagement.
People in this work
Related across the archive
Primary work[Letter to Prime Minister]
Primary work[Letter to Mr Minoo Masani]
Primary workADJOURNMENT MOTION
ThePrintBank nationalisation will be a blow to India’s mixed economy, lead to totalitarianism: Phiroze Shroff
ThePrintIf fundamental right to property can be taken away, so can all the others: AG Mulgaokar