Skip to content
Indian Liberals
Filter:

Tip: search runs across all languages; results are tokenised per-page using the document's lang attribute. Search inside the documents →

letter

Letter to Mr Homi Modi

Dungarpur · 1959

2 pages

Summary

This two-page letter, dated 21 September 1959 and signed by Nathu Singh, is addressed to Mr Homi Modi and discusses the newly formed Swatantra Party. Singh reports that meetings in Bombay and Ahmedabad have left him concerned about the party’s future, especially the sincerity and local influence of its regional organisers and leaders. He argues that the party must clarify that it is not opposed to a socialist approach to national problems, but to the Congress policy of “levelling down.”

The letter proposes a more constructive economic programme: fair dealing with poorer people in urban areas, assurances for salaried employees, higher factory wages, and incentives for capital investment. Singh contends that such measures could attract capable, experienced, and reliable people from the Kutch region to the party. He also warns that Congress leaders appear too arrogant or zealous to accommodate a party founded on principles opposed to Swatantra’s conception. In a postscript, he says he will answer an earlier letter, comments on the need to be useful in politics, and promises to write about the “Great Mogul” and the treatment of the army since independence.

Key points

  • The letter evaluates early impressions of the Swatantra Party’s organisation and prospects after meetings in Bombay and Ahmedabad.
  • It calls for a clear distinction between accepting a socialist approach to national problems and opposing the Congress policy of “levelling down.”
  • It recommends fairer treatment of poorer urban residents, salaried employees, and industrial workers.
  • It proposes incentives for capital investment and a larger share of factory profits for workers.
  • It argues that a practical economic programme could attract capable and experienced local leaders from Kutch.
  • It criticises Congress leaders as too arrogant or zealous to accept a party based on opposing principles.
  • The postscript addresses political usefulness, tolerance, and a forthcoming discussion of the army’s treatment since independence.

Metadata and summary are AI-extracted from the source PDF and reviewed for editorial accuracy. The original work is available via the Read PDF tab above (where present); paragraph-level citation inside the PDF is deferred to a future engagement.

Related across the archive