Skip to content
Indian Liberals
Filter:

Tip: search runs across all languages; results are tokenised per-page using the document's lang attribute. Search inside the documents →

letter

[Letter from Mr Minoo Masani]

Bombay · 1963

3 pages

Summary

This three-page letter, dated 7 August 1963 and sent from Bombay by Shri M. R. Masani, M.P., gives notice to the Secretary of the Lok Sabha of three starred questions for parliamentary answer. The questions concern Dearness Allowance paid to Central Government employees posted in the former State of Bombay and in Gujarat, including whether allowances differed from those paid to State Government employees before the Second Pay Commission’s recommendations and whether Gujarat had implemented those recommendations.

The notices also ask about the Pay Commission’s recommendations for Central Government employees posted outside Delhi, any implementation deadline it specified, the extent to which State Governments had adopted the recommendations, and steps being taken by the Government of India where implementation was delayed. The pages contain questions only; no ministerial answers or subsequent proceedings are included.

Key points

  • The document consists of three formal starred-question notices addressed to the Secretary, Lok Sabha.
  • All three notices are dated 7th August 1963 and identify Bombay as the place of issue.
  • One question asks whether Dearness Allowance for Central Government employees in the former State of Bombay exceeded that paid to State Government employees before the Second Pay Commission’s recommendations.
  • A second question focuses specifically on complaints from Central Government employees posted in Gujarat about incomplete implementation of the Pay Commission’s recommendations.
  • The notices seek details about any differences in Dearness Allowance increases between Maharashtra and Gujarat, including their effective dates.
  • The final notice asks about recommendations for employees posted outside Delhi, implementation deadlines, State Government compliance, and Central Government action against defaulting States.
  • The rendered pages provide no answers, administrative response, or later parliamentary outcome.

Metadata and summary are AI-extracted from the source PDF and reviewed for editorial accuracy. The original work is available via the Read PDF tab above (where present); paragraph-level citation inside the PDF is deferred to a future engagement.

Related across the archive