Skip to content
Indian Liberals
Filter:

Tip: search runs across all languages; results are tokenised per-page using the document's lang attribute. Search inside the documents →

letter

[Letters from bhanu Pratap Singh]

By Bhanu Pratap Singh

New Delhi · 1976

3 pages

Summary

In this three-page letter dated June 25, 1976, Bhanu Pratap Singh explains the Bharatiya Lok Dal’s position on the proposed merger of opposition parties. He affirms the party’s commitment to a genuine merger but rejects forming a new party without dissolving the existing parties and without agreement on a programme that is more Gandhian than socialist. Singh argues that the merger process has been procedurally defective: the parties should first have jointly drafted and approved a common policy statement before committing themselves to the new organisation.

Singh specifically criticises the Steering Committee’s “Approach” paper for endorsing agitation over constitutional methods, expanding public distribution of foodgrains, adopting a one-sided labour policy, embracing total planning, and failing to give agriculture sufficient clarity and emphasis. He says the B.L.D. therefore passed an “out-spoken” resolution on May 31, while continuing to seek a larger meeting of the four party leaders. The letter closes by disputing the claim that all opposition leaders favoured merger, citing non-cooperation from Congress (O) units in several states, and insisting that the B.L.D. will not “take a leap in the dark.”

Key points

  • Singh reaffirms the B.L.D.’s commitment to a genuine merger of the opposition parties.
  • He conditions merger on dissolving the existing parties and agreeing on a common, sufficiently Gandhian programme.
  • He criticises the merger procedure for failing to secure prior agreement on policy and programme.
  • The B.L.D. objects to the “Approach” paper’s emphasis on agitation, public distribution, compulsory bonuses, total planning, and inadequate agricultural policy.
  • Singh says the B.L.D.’s May 31 resolution was deliberately outspoken rather than evasive.
  • He proposes a larger meeting of the four party leaders, followed by endorsement by each party’s Working Committee.
  • He rejects the claim that all opposition leaders support merger and says the B.L.D. will not proceed without clear consent.

Metadata and summary are AI-extracted from the source PDF and reviewed for editorial accuracy. The original work is available via the Read PDF tab above (where present); paragraph-level citation inside the PDF is deferred to a future engagement.

People in this work

Related across the archive