Skip to content
Indian Liberals
Filter:

Tip: search runs across all languages; results are tokenised per-page using the document's lang attribute. Search inside the documents →

correspondence

[Letter to Narendra Singh Mahida]

By Minoo Masani

London · 1962

3 pages

Summary

This three-page English-language correspondence dossier contains two confidential letters exchanged in 1962 between Narendra(singh) Mahida, a Lok Sabha member and Secretary of the Swatantra Party Parliamentary Group, and M. R. Masani. In his letter of 21 August, Mahida explains that he resigned after becoming dissatisfied with the situation in the party, though the group asked him to continue. He says he had heard from reliable sources that Masani did not want him to remain secretary and asks for frankness, mutual confidence, and clarity about whether another person should take over.

In his reply from London dated 4 September, Masani denies that he wanted Mahida removed. He explains that it was his duty to place the matter before the party’s Parliamentary Board and consult the Acting Leader and others about the appointment of office-bearers for the next session. Masani thanks Mahida for writing openly and advises him not to rely on second- or third-hand gossip. The exchange documents an internal party dispute centred on office-bearing, communication, trust, and orderly party procedure.

Key points

  • The dossier consists of Mahida’s letter of 21 August 1962 and Masani’s reply of 4 September 1962.
  • Mahida reports resigning as Secretary of the Swatantra Party Parliamentary Group because of dissatisfaction with the party situation.
  • He says the group did not accept his resignation and requested that he continue in the post.
  • Mahida raises an unverified report that Masani did not want him to remain secretary and asks for direct communication.
  • Mahida offers to make room for another person whom Masani considers more capable.
  • Masani denies wishing Mahida to leave and describes consultations about party office-bearers as part of his duty.
  • Both letters emphasise confidentiality, teamwork, confidence, trust, and the dangers of second-hand reports.

Metadata and summary are AI-extracted from the source PDF and reviewed for editorial accuracy. The original work is available via the Read PDF tab above (where present); paragraph-level citation inside the PDF is deferred to a future engagement.

People in this work

Related across the archive