Skip to content
Indian Liberals
Filter:

Tip: search runs across all languages; results are tokenised per-page using the document's lang attribute. Search inside the documents →

letter

[Letter from Girish K Munshi]

Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, Kulapati K. M. Munshi Marg, Chowpatty, Bombay-7. · Bombay · 1977

2 pages

Summary

This two-page letter, dated March 8, 1977, is Girish K. Munshi’s reply to K. H. Subramanian, L. H. Sampat, and S. V. Raju concerning a dispute over the Swatantra Party’s principles, properties, and assets. Munshi, writing after consultation with “Parmanandji,” acknowledges that the party was founded on principles associated with Rajaji, Masani, and others, but argues that political parties may revise their principles as circumstances change and that party principles are therefore not immutable.

The letter maintains that office-bearers holding party properties and assets are bound by the direction of the State Council of the Maharashtra Swatantra Party. Because the recipients remain dissatisfied, Munshi proposes referring the dispute to an eminent third person acceptable to both sides for arbitration. He identifies four issues for determination: whether the properties are held subject to an obligation annexed to ownership, whether office-bearers can apply them to purposes other than the party’s governing principles, what rectification may be needed, and any incidental issues. A postscript notes that he is attending to a separate matter involving Sassoon J. David & Co.

Key points

  • The letter responds to a recorded dispute involving the Swatantra Party’s principles and assets.
  • It states that the party’s founding principles were associated with Rajaji, Masani, and other founders.
  • It argues that political parties may alter their principles in response to changing circumstances.
  • It asserts that office-bearers holding party property are bound by the direction of the Maharashtra State Council.
  • It proposes arbitration by an eminent third person acceptable to both sides.
  • It lists ownership obligations, permissible uses of assets, rectification, and incidental matters as questions for arbitration.
  • The postscript records that Munshi is handling correspondence concerning Sassoon J. David & Co.

Metadata and summary are AI-extracted from the source PDF and reviewed for editorial accuracy. The original work is available via the Read PDF tab above (where present); paragraph-level citation inside the PDF is deferred to a future engagement.

Related across the archive