Skip to content
Indian Liberals
Filter:

Tip: search runs across all languages; results are tokenised per-page using the document's lang attribute. Search inside the documents →

letter

[Letter to Bhanu Babu]

Lucknow · 1968

2 pages

Summary

This two-page typed letter from Lucknow, dated 2 April 1968 and signed by KDR Pandey, reports a detailed calculation of preference votes in an election. Addressed to “Bhanu Babu,” it traces first-, second-, and third-preference transfers among candidates affiliated with the Congress, BKD, PSP, Swatantra, Republican, JS, and Independent groups. The writer argues that the distribution of preferences affected the survival and election of several candidates, particularly Ram Ghulam, R. C. Shukla, Virendra Shah, and Saidul Hasan.

The letter emphasizes that the Independent group did not provide Bhanu Babu with any second- or third-preference votes and cautions the recipient against making a hasty decision. It records candidate totals against a stated target of 2,979, identifies Saidul Hasan as elected as the twelfth candidate and another candidate as elected as the thirteenth, and notes Shanti Devi’s elimination after falling short of the required amount. The document is an electoral analysis and political communication rather than a general statement of political theory.

Key points

  • The letter is dated Lucknow, 2 April 1968, and is addressed to Bhanu Babu.
  • KDR Pandey presents a breakdown of first-, second-, and third-preference votes.
  • Preference transfers are traced among Congress, BKD, PSP, Swatantra, Republican, JS, and Independent candidates.
  • The writer argues that retaining particular candidates in the contest was necessary for Ram Ghulam’s victory.
  • The letter records Saidul Hasan as elected as the twelfth candidate and a further candidate as elected as the thirteenth.
  • Shanti Devi is reported as eliminated after receiving fewer votes than the required amount.
  • The recipient is warned that no second- or third-preference votes came from the Independent group and is urged not to decide hastily.

Metadata and summary are AI-extracted from the source PDF and reviewed for editorial accuracy. The original work is available via the Read PDF tab above (where present); paragraph-level citation inside the PDF is deferred to a future engagement.

Related across the archive