Skip to content
Indian Liberals
Filter:

Tip: search runs across all languages; results are tokenised per-page using the document's lang attribute. Search inside the documents →

letter

[Letter to N G Ranga]

By Minoo Masani

London · 1964

2 pages

Summary

In this letter dated 21 August 1964, Minoo Masani writes to Professor N. G. Ranga about a forthcoming Parliamentary Board meeting and an attached circular and draft resolution prepared by K. M. Munshi. The immediate issue is the political situation in Bihar: Masani reports dissatisfaction among party members and organisational uncertainty, which he attributes partly to the party’s past hesitation and wavering conduct. He says S. V. Raju has been explaining the party’s position and that support for removing the incumbent State President is becoming consistent among local members and legislators. Masani asks Ranga to approve a resolution requiring Ranga to explain his refusal to comply with the Organisation Sub-Committee’s decision. He anticipates that any further action will depend on Ranga’s reply and notes that an appeal to the General Council may have to be considered. The letter also records arrangements for the meeting, Munshi’s report and proposed attendance, and Masani’s correspondence with Liberal International officials concerning Ranga’s visits. The attached circular and draft resolution mentioned in the letter are not included in the rendered pages.

Key points

  • Masani discusses a Parliamentary Board meeting scheduled for 6 September 1964. The letter focuses on organisational and political developments in Bihar. Masani reports party dissatisfaction and doubts about the Organisation Sub-Committee’s past conduct. Support is described as growing for removing the incumbent Bihar State President. K. M. Munshi’s report was circulated to the General Council and released to the press. Masani seeks Ranga’s approval of a resolution requiring him to explain his refusal to follow the Organisation Sub-Committee’s decision.
  • Any appeal to the General Council is left dependent on Ranga’s response.

Metadata and summary are AI-extracted from the source PDF and reviewed for editorial accuracy. The original work is available via the Read PDF tab above (where present); paragraph-level citation inside the PDF is deferred to a future engagement.

People in this work

Related across the archive