minutes
[Swatantra Party Minutes of Meeting]
Swatantra Party Parliamentary Office · New Delhi · 1967
1 pages
Summary
This one-page office record from the Swatantra Party Parliamentary Office reports a General Body meeting held in Parliament House, New Delhi, on 13 December 1967. It lists 20 members present and records decisions on parliamentary responses to allegations concerning foreign contributions to political parties, the Language Bill, a proposed short-duration discussion on Sheikh Abdullah, the Unlawful Activities Bill, supplementary grants, deficit financing, and outstanding party-member contributions.
The meeting approved M. R. Masani’s proposed personal explanation to the Lok Sabha, rejected an initiative to table a substitute resolution concerning the Language Bill, and decided to whip members to support circulation of the Bill for public opinion. Members agreed to oppose the Unlawful Activities Bill and to follow arguments in a dissenting minute by Professor M. Ruthnaswamy. The record is signed by J. M. Lobo Prabhu as Secretary and provides no separately stated author or printed title.
Key points
- The General Body meeting took place on 13 December 1967 at 10 a.m. in Room No. 50, Parliament House, New Delhi.
- Twenty members are listed as present, including M. R. Masani, Rajaji, Piloo Mody, and Professor M. Ruthnaswamy.
- The party approved M. R. Masani’s request to make a personal-explanation statement in the Lok Sabha regarding allegations about foreign contributions to political parties.
- The Executive Committee’s decision against tabling a substitute resolution on the Language Bill was endorsed, and members were instructed to support circulation of the Bill for public opinion.
- The meeting decided that the party should oppose the Unlawful Activities Bill and use arguments set out in Professor M. Ruthnaswamy’s dissenting minute.
- Members assigned speaking roles for parliamentary business, including Meghrajji and M. N. Amarsey.
- The party planned a short-duration discussion on deficit financing and asked members to clear contribution arrears.
Metadata and summary are AI-extracted from the source PDF and reviewed for editorial accuracy. The original work is available via the Read PDF tab above (where present); paragraph-level citation inside the PDF is deferred to a future engagement.


