Skip to content
Indian Liberals
Filter:

Tip: search runs across all languages; results are tokenised per-page using the document's lang attribute. Search inside the documents →

letter

[Letter to N G Ranga]

SWATANTRA PARTY (BIHAR) · Bombay · 1963

1 pages

Summary

This one-page letter, written by Kamakhya Narain Singh from Bombay on 9 February 1963 to Prof. N. G. Ranga, addresses controversy within the Swatantra Party in Bihar. Singh explains that, after returning from Europe, he learned that a report he had submitted to the party’s Central Organisation Committee following the March 1962 general elections had been scrutinised and described as offensive, undemocratic, and incorrect. He regrets that a Joint Committee resolution in July 1962 publicised the criticism without giving him an opportunity to explain his conduct in person.

Singh distinguishes his intentions from the report’s language, attributing its severity to his disappointment at the party’s unexpectedly poor electoral performance in Bihar. He acknowledges that the report may have hurt colleagues with whom he had maintained cordial relations, apologises for the offence, and withdraws the offending and damaging passages. In a postscript, he states that he has decided to implement the Committee’s resolution, while clarifying that he was absent when it was adopted and had not known of the appeal against it.

Key points

  • Singh writes to N. G. Ranga about internal controversy in the Swatantra Party in Bihar.
  • He says a report submitted after the March 1962 general elections was later criticised as offensive, undemocratic, and incorrect.
  • He attributes the report’s strong language to disappointment over the party’s poor electoral results in Bihar.
  • He regrets that the matter was publicised without allowing him to explain his conduct directly.
  • He states that he did not intend to insult members of the party’s Central Organisation Committee.
  • He apologises, withdraws the offending passages, and expresses regret for wounding colleagues’ feelings.
  • The postscript says he will carry out the Committee’s resolution despite having been absent when it was adopted.

Metadata and summary are AI-extracted from the source PDF and reviewed for editorial accuracy. The original work is available via the Read PDF tab above (where present); paragraph-level citation inside the PDF is deferred to a future engagement.

Related across the archive