[Letter to Mr Minoo Masani]

Summary

This two-page handwritten letter, dated only “July 7” and signed uncertainly as “Ranga,” responds to Minoo Masani about a proposed petition challenging the constitutionality of the Emergency. The writer reports that the response from prospective lawyers has been negative and that they are reluctant to undertake a constitutional challenge. The writer also cautions that the relevant rules could be amended quickly.

The writer distinguishes between being willing to act as counsel and taking responsibility for organising the legal effort. Having sought opinions from two lawyers without success, the writer invites Masani to discuss the matter in person, arguing that a telephone conversation would not adequately convey the situation. The letter closes by reporting the practical difficulties candidly and warning that the circumstances may embarrass Masani as well.

Key points

• The letter addresses the proposed legal challenge to the constitutionality of the Emergency.
• The writer says that responses to the petition idea have been negative.
• Prospective lawyers are described as unwilling or anxious to challenge the Emergency’s constitutionality.
• The writer is prepared to act as counsel but not to organise the legal effort.
• Two lawyers were consulted, but their opinions produced no workable support.
• The writer prefers an in-person discussion with Masani rather than a telephone conversation.