report · position paper
UPADHYAYA CHARGES SWATANTRA WITH VIOLATING COMMITMENT
Bhilwara · 1964
1 pages
Summary
This one-page English press report, headed “ORGANISER” and dated May 18, 1964, records remarks attributed to Deendayal Upadhyaya at an election meeting in Bhilwara on May 12. Upadhyaya accused the Swatantra Party of deliberately violating an electoral understanding. He said that he and M. R. Masani had jointly agreed that, where both parties had previously contested a seat, one party would receive a prior option to contest a by-election. On this account, he argued that Swatantra should not have contested the Bhilwara seat against the Bharatiya Jan Sangh, and described its action as improper and politically immoral.
The report also presents Upadhyaya’s criticism of Swatantra’s handling of Nathu Singh’s candidacy, which he said had changed from an independent contest to a Swatantra ticket. In its closing paragraph, the report turns to Kashmir: Upadhyaya assigns equal responsibility to Congress and Swatantra for the “bunglings” there, refers to proposed settlements involving Nehru and Sheikh Abdullah, and says that the Jan Sangh would make every sacrifice to save Kashmir. The document has no printed author byline, publisher, issuer, or table of contents.
Key points
- Deendayal Upadhyaya accused the Swatantra Party of violating a prior electoral understanding.
- The alleged agreement concerned priority to contest by-elections in seats previously contested by both parties.
- Upadhyaya said the Swatantra candidacy in Bhilwara should have been left to the Bharatiya Jan Sangh.
- He criticised the shifting status of Nathu Singh’s candidacy.
- The report attributes to Upadhyaya an accusation that both Congress and Swatantra were responsible for problems in Kashmir.
- Upadhyaya declared that the Jan Sangh would make no sacrifice too great to save Kashmir.
Metadata and summary are AI-extracted from the source PDF and reviewed for editorial accuracy. The original work is available via the Read PDF tab above (where present); paragraph-level citation inside the PDF is deferred to a future engagement.




