Skip to content
Indian Liberals
Filter:

Tip: search runs across all languages; results are tokenised per-page using the document's lang attribute. Search inside the documents →

letter

[JPS letter to MRM]

By Jayaprakash Narayan

3 pages

Summary

In this undated letter to an implied socialist correspondent, Jayaprakash Narayan distinguishes between the practical usefulness of Gandhi’s “new dynamic” and the validity of its underlying theory. He argues that Gandhian methods may have generated a useful form of mass action that socialists could adopt, while rejecting the theory as “utterly unscientific and built up of hocus-pocus.” He contrasts Gandhian and socialist understandings of social change, and suggests that the wartime record and the Cripps episode cast doubt on the explanatory power of the Gandhian approach.

Narayan also cautions against abandoning socialism because of disappointment with the Stalin regime, just as one should not reject Gandhism because of the Congress ministries. He maintains that Marxist theory offers an adequate explanation of Stalinism’s failure, but accepts that his correspondent has reached a firm religious and intellectual conclusion. The letter closes by urging the recipient to remain active in larger political movements and by expressing hope that the “new dynamic” may yet help solve social problems, while reaffirming Narayan’s prayerful concern.

Key points

  • Narayan disputes the claim that Gandhian methods have no utility for the socialist movement.
  • He separates the practical value of Gandhian mass action from what he regards as the weak theoretical basis of the “new dynamic.”
  • He cites Gandhi’s statement that God is the force among all forces and argues that non-violence without reliance on that force is inadequate.
  • He criticizes the Gandhian explanation of the war, the communal problem, and anarchy, especially in light of the Cripps episode.
  • He rejects disillusionment with socialism or communism solely because of the Stalin regime.
  • He argues that Marxist theory adequately explains the failure of Stalinism.
  • He encourages the recipient to participate in wider political movements rather than retreat from political life.

Metadata and summary are AI-extracted from the source PDF and reviewed for editorial accuracy. The original work is available via the Read PDF tab above (where present); paragraph-level citation inside the PDF is deferred to a future engagement.

People in this work

Related across the archive