Skip to content
Indian Liberals
Filter:

Tip: search runs across all languages; results are tokenised per-page using the document's lang attribute. Search inside the documents →

letter

General Secretary's Letter No. 298

Swatantra party national headquarters · Bombay · 1974

1 pages

Summary

General Secretary’s Letter No. 298, dated March 23, 1974, is an urgent circular from Madhu Mehta of the Swatantra Party opposing the Government of India’s decision to take over the wholesale trade in wheat. The letter reports that the Party’s National Executive had adopted a resolution against the measure at its February 18 meeting in New Delhi, and that a nationwide hartal by the foodgrains trade on March 21 had received a very good response.

Mehta asks party organisers to come prepared for the Swatantra Party’s Sixth National Convention in Madras with proposals for mobilising farmers, retailers, and wholesalers against the government’s policy. The proposed campaign is to include direct action and a coordinated programme decided at Madras. The circular also urges immediate contact with merchants, traders, and farmers, recommends seeking the assistance of H. K. Gengaiah of the Farmers Federation of India and its former leaders, and gives special attention to party units in wheat-growing states.

Key points

  • The circular opposes the Government of India’s takeover of the wholesale wheat trade.
  • The Swatantra Party’s National Executive adopted an anti-takeover resolution on February 18, 1974.
  • A foodgrains trade hartal held on March 21 is described as having received a very good response throughout the country.
  • Party organisers are asked to mobilise farmers, retailers, and wholesalers before the Sixth National Convention in Madras.
  • The proposed campaign is to include direct action and a coordinated programme.
  • The letter calls for immediate cooperation from merchants, traders, and farmers under the Swatantra Party banner.
  • Units in wheat-growing states, including Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat, Rajasthan, and Maharashtra, receive special emphasis.

Metadata and summary are AI-extracted from the source PDF and reviewed for editorial accuracy. The original work is available via the Read PDF tab above (where present); paragraph-level citation inside the PDF is deferred to a future engagement.

Related across the archive