Skip to content
Indian Liberals
Filter:

Tip: search runs across all languages; results are tokenised per-page using the document's lang attribute. Search inside the documents →

letter

[Swatantra paid Penalty for lack of effort in Rajasthan]

Bombay · 1968

2 pages

Summary

This two-page archival file combines a newspaper clipping and a typed business letter. The clipping, headed “Swatantra paid penalty for lack of effort in Rajasthan,” reports on the Swatantra Party’s poor performance in Rajasthan and attributes its defeat to inadequate organisation, weak campaigning, factional disagreements, and insufficient polling-day effort. It also records criticism of the Congress campaign and disputes concerning ballot boxes and election arrangements, while naming several regional political figures, including Maharani Gayatri Devi and Bhairon Singh Shekhawat.

The second page is a rejection letter dated May 23, 1968, from Personnel & Productivity Services in Bombay. Addressed “Dear Sir,” it acknowledges an application responding to an advertisement for a Chartered Accountant, explains that other applicants’ qualifications and experience more closely matched the organisation’s needs, and advises the applicant to submit a fresh application for any future advertised post. The author and recipient are not clearly identified; the handwritten signature is only partly legible.

Key points

  • A newspaper clipping reports that the Swatantra Party paid an electoral penalty for inadequate effort in Rajasthan.
  • The clipping links the party’s weak result to poor organisation, limited campaigning, and insufficient polling-day mobilisation.
  • It records internal party statements and criticism of Congress election methods, including allegations concerning transport and ballot boxes.
  • Maharani Gayatri Devi and other Rajasthan political figures are named in the report.
  • A typed letter dated May 23, 1968, rejects an application for a Chartered Accountant position.
  • The letter states that other applicants’ qualifications and experience better matched the organisation’s requirements.
  • The file does not clearly identify the letter’s recipient or the signer.

Metadata and summary are AI-extracted from the source PDF and reviewed for editorial accuracy. The original work is available via the Read PDF tab above (where present); paragraph-level citation inside the PDF is deferred to a future engagement.

Related across the archive