Skip to content
Indian Liberals
Filter:

Tip: search runs across all languages; results are tokenised per-page using the document's lang attribute. Search inside the documents →

letter

[Letter to Jayaprakash Naryan]

1972

2 pages

Summary

In this letter dated 21 June 1972, the writer addresses Jayaprakash Narayan at Yercaud after visiting the M. R. A. Ashram at Panchgani. The writer describes discussions with young people about India’s political condition and proposes a panel of independent public figures who could act as “the conscience of the country” in the absence of effective opposition parties and a fearless press. The proposed panel would comment on current developments and examine legislation raising fundamental issues that Parliament, as presently constituted, is unable or unwilling to address.

The letter also proposes an informal India–Pakistan discussion involving Indians and Pakistanis, with a domestic meeting planned under the title “Towards Better Indo-Pak Relations.” The writer asks Narayan to help suggest participants, offers to arrange a Panchgani meeting with Prabhavati, and closes by mentioning forthcoming Swatantra Party meetings in Madras and Rajaji. The two rendered pages show the complete letter; the author’s signature appears to be “( M. R. M. )” but remains unresolved in the supplied authority data.

Key points

  • The writer proposes a panel of ten or twelve independent people to serve as a public conscience on India’s political condition.
  • The panel would comment on current developments and scrutinize fundamental legislative issues that Parliament cannot or will not address.
  • Suggested participants include former chief justices, public intellectuals, journalists, and political figures.
  • The letter proposes informal India–Pakistan discussions and a meeting on “Towards Better Indo-Pak Relations.”
  • The writer seeks Jayaprakash Narayan’s cooperation, suggestions for invitees, and possible participation.
  • The letter refers to upcoming Swatantra Party meetings in Madras and Rajaji.

Metadata and summary are AI-extracted from the source PDF and reviewed for editorial accuracy. The original work is available via the Read PDF tab above (where present); paragraph-level citation inside the PDF is deferred to a future engagement.

Related across the archive