Skip to content
Indian Liberals
Filter:

Tip: search runs across all languages; results are tokenised per-page using the document's lang attribute. Search inside the documents →

letter

[Letter to Mr Minoo Masani]

By N. Dandekar

BOMBAY · 1974

1 pages

Summary

In this letter dated 23 July 1974, N. Dandeker writes to M. R. Masani about Masani’s proposed resolution on the future of the Swatantra Party, to be discussed at the Party’s National Convention in Delhi on 4–5 August. Dandeker says he “profoundly disagree[s]” with the proposal to turn the party into a non-political organisation, arguing that this would leave it politically irrelevant and expose it to ridicule. If the party truly has no future political potential, he suggests, it would be better simply to wind it up, while allowing willing state units to continue independently.

Dandeker instead maintains that the party’s principles and programme retain potential validity and relevance at the national level, even if the existing organisation does not. He supports Piloo Mody’s effort to join with other parties in presenting a coherent national alternative to the ruling Congress. The letter welcomes Congress’s unwillingness to participate in such an alliance but criticises the Jan Sangh’s refusal to do so.

Key points

  • Dandeker rejects Masani’s proposal to convert the Swatantra Party into a non-political organisation.
  • He argues that a non-political Swatantra Party would become an object of ridicule among Indian political parties.
  • If the party has no future political potential, he prefers dissolution to an officially non-political existence.
  • He distinguishes between the continuing relevance of the party’s principles and programme and the inadequacy of its present organisational form.
  • He supports Piloo Mody’s attempt to build a coherent national alternative to the ruling Congress.
  • He regards Congress’s refusal to join such an effort as unfortunate but approves of the Jan Sangh’s refusal only in the sense that he does not regard it as unfortunate.

Metadata and summary are AI-extracted from the source PDF and reviewed for editorial accuracy. The original work is available via the Read PDF tab above (where present); paragraph-level citation inside the PDF is deferred to a future engagement.

People in this work

Related across the archive