Skip to content
Indian Liberals
Filter:

Tip: search runs across all languages; results are tokenised per-page using the document's lang attribute.

interview

The Challenges leading to the Forest Rights Act, 2006

2020

Summary

Activists Ambrish Mehta and Trupti Mehta of ARCH-Vahini recount the long struggle that culminated in the Forest Rights Act, 2006. They trace the arc from the 1980s, when activists pressed for recognition of tribal cultivators' land rights under state-level resolutions such as Gujarat's 1972 and 1992 orders, through the 1995 Godavarman PIL in the Supreme Court that expanded judicial oversight of forests nationwide. A November 2001 interlocutory application about encroachments led the Ministry of Environment and Forest to issue a 5 March 2002 circular ordering all states to evict encroachers by 30 September — triggering home demolitions (including with elephants) in Maharashtra, Odisha and Assam.

This crisis catalysed the Campaign for Survival and Dignity, an umbrella of grassroots groups and individuals working on tribal rights, which lobbied political parties and met Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. Singh proposed a statutory solution, with the Ministry of Tribal Affairs (not Environment and Forest) as the nodal agency, after the Supreme Court had earlier struck down a Vajpayee-era regularization circular as an election gimmick. Campaign members were included in drafting.

The speakers underscore that the resulting Act — passed unanimously in Parliament in 2006 and notified in January 2008 — was unprecedented in centring the Gram Sabha rather than revenue or forest officers in inviting, examining and deciding individual rights claims.

Key points

  • State-level regularization (Gujarat 1972, 1992) failed to deliver recognized rights to most tribal cultivators, prompting a sustained grassroots struggle from the 1980s.
  • The 1995 Godavarman PIL expanded Supreme Court oversight to forests across all Indian states.
  • A November 2001 IA on encroachments led MoEF to issue a 5 March 2002 circular ordering nationwide evictions by 30 September 2002, with houses razed in Maharashtra, Odisha and Assam.
  • The Campaign for Survival and Dignity emerged as an umbrella platform of grassroots organizations, activists and individuals working on tribal rights.
  • PM Manmohan Singh proposed a statute and that the Ministry of Tribal Affairs (not Environment and Forest) serve as nodal agency, after the Supreme Court struck down a Vajpayee-era regularization circular.
  • Campaign members were included in the drafting, producing the first Indian statute to centre the Gram Sabha in inviting and adjudicating claims.
  • The Forest Rights Act was passed unanimously by Parliament in 2006 and notified for implementation in January 2008.

Transcript

The Challenges leading to the Forest Rights Act, 2006

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EqCp8knf-_A Duration: 471.1s

Speaker (00:05): From the nineteen eighties, people like us were struggling, were helping the people to struggle and have their rights recognized. So in many of the states, there were some government resolutions also passed that regularize the land. Say, for example, in Gujarat, there was one 1972 resolution. And then in 1992 resolution, they had stated, they provided that so and so person was cultivating land before 1980, he or she should be, her, their, his or her rights will be recognized. But in Gujarat, we saw that most of the people who were cultivating, they didn’t get their, they could get the rights recognized. So there was a big, I mean, big movement. Almost means the people, the tribal people, and the people like us were, of course, had means were struggling to get it. At that time, meanwhile, what happened that in 1995, there was a case in the Supreme Court. One Mr. Godavarman filed a public interest litigation in the Supreme Court against the illicit cutting that was taking place in the estate that was there, his own forefathers had nurtured. So Supreme Court took up this case. Not only that, the Supreme Court gave many orders regarding this. Supreme Court extended the scope of the of this PIL and extended to all the states of India. So it was known as forest case, and it is, only it is now also, it is very much there in the Supreme Court. So in 2001, in November 2001, Mr. Michael’s query, he filed an interlocutory application in this case that there are so many encroachers, and that is very worrisome. So the Supreme Court just wanted to ask, wanted to know how much encroachment exists in five or six states. And the Supreme Court passed an order on that. Interestingly, taking a cue from this, the Ministry of Environment and Forest, what they did, they passed an order. They just, they just wrote out a circular to all the states, not only five to six states, but to all the states, asking the state governments to remove all the encroachments in their respective states within three months. So this order was passed. This circular was brought out in on 05/03/2002. And they gave the timeline of that before September 30, they they have to remove all the encroachments. And it happened also in Maharashtra, in Odisha, in Assam. Many of these forest departments, they started removing these encroachments. They started razing the houses also with the help of elephants also. So at that time, there was very much, you and I. And many many people like us, this ticket means for us, it was enough, for enough was enough. So we worked together, and then this Campaign for Survival and Dignity was born. That is a organization. It is a loose organization. Well, it’s it’s an umbrella organization in which most of, means, most of the organizations and grassroots activists and individuals who were working on this issue, tribal’s rights, they joined this campaign. We were also part of that, and then we lobbied and we campaigned for this. We met the prime minister, at that time was Manmohan Singh, and Manmohan Singh suggested that we should have a statute. I’m not going into the details of the history. Why he suggested this? Because in the time of Vajpayee government, there was the Ministry of Environment. They had brought out one circular to regularize this thing, but the Supreme Court shut, shut it down, that shut it down that because of this, this is a election gimmick. And so it is no longer, it should not be valid. So Manmohan Singh himself suggested that there should be a statute, and the nodal agency should not be the Environment and Forest Ministry, but it should be the Tribal Ministry. And at that time, this, this the seeds were sown in this meeting with the, month with the prime minister. He also suggested that some of the people from campaign also should be a part of this drafting process, and it was, I think, it was very good because it, because this is the first statute. This is the first act which has recognized the role of the Gram Sabha. Otherwise, what has happened? In most, in not most, in all of the acts, it is the, the officers either from the revenue department or from the forest department. It is the officers who would decide who cultivates where and all these things, and they prepare a basic list of the people. Here, the whole situation was changed. It was the Gram Sabha which should initiate the process of inviting the claims. And then it is, it is the Gram Sabha which decides, which examines and decides the claims of the individuals. So in that sense, this act was a very, I think, landmark act, and it was unprecedented. And this was the, I think it was, it was the beginning of the drafting process, and it was the beginning of the act. So after, means we had to lobby with all the political parties and everything. Meantime, it they they were the years of too much lobbying and campaigning and everybody, means all the parties, because this act was passed unanimously in the parliament, and it was passed in 2006. So, so one year was left before the rules were notified and the act came into being, came to be implemented. And in January 2008, the Forest Rights Act was notified, and it’s done, the implementation of the act was started.

Notable passages

"We were also part of that, and then we lobbied and we campaigned for this. We met the prime minister, at that time was Manmohan Singh"
Direct participation in the political lobbying that produced the FRA.
"this is the first statute. This is the first act which has recognized the role of the Gram Sabha."
Speaker's central claim about the Act's distinctive constitutional innovation.
"Almost means the people, the tribal people, and the people like us were, of course, had means were struggling to get it."
Joint activist voice characteristic of the ARCH-Vahini pair.
"He also suggested that some of the people from campaign also should be a part of this drafting process"
Singh opened the drafting to civil society — a decisive political choice the speakers credit for the Act's design.
"this is a election gimmick. And so it is no longer, it should not be valid."
Court's characterization of the Vajpayee government's circular, explaining why a statute was needed.
"Supreme Court extended the scope of the of this PIL and extended to all the states of India. So it was known as forest case"
The Godavarman case became the pan-India forest jurisdiction through which the 2002 eviction order travelled.

Metadata and summary are AI-extracted from the source PDF and reviewed for editorial accuracy. The original work is available via the Read PDF tab above (where present); paragraph-level citation inside the PDF is deferred to a future engagement.

People in this work

Related across the archive