Summary
This two-page correspondence, dated 5 March 1969, concerns whether reservations for Scheduled Castes should continue beyond 1970. C. Rajagopalachari writes to C. C. Desai that he was the author of the original reservation arrangement and now supports terminating it, arguing that three decades have produced no expected benefit and that the arrangement has become futile. He explicitly differs from Desai’s request to continue the system.
M. R. Masani’s letter to Rajagopalachari records the arguments advanced by Dandekar and others against Desai’s proposal. These include the claims that reservations had not benefited the intended classes, had created a further point of corruption and retarded national integration, would make the party appear opportunistic, and might cost Harijan or tribal votes in the 1972 elections. Masani notes that there was a majority of sorts for Desai’s proposal at the earlier discussion, but no consensus. The letters also mention Rajagopalachari’s forthcoming visit to Delhi, his planned parliamentary budget speech, and an enclosed copy of Masani’s Rajaji birthday lecture.
Key points
- Rajagopalachari opposes continuing reservations for Scheduled Castes beyond 1970.
- He states that the reservation arrangement had been accepted by Dr. B. R. Ambedkar with difficulty.
- Rajagopalachari argues that three decades of the arrangement had failed to produce the expected results.
- Masani lists objections that reservations had not helped the concerned classes and had harmed national integration.
- The correspondence raises concerns about corruption, party image, electoral expediency, and the 1972 elections.
- Masani records that the earlier discussion produced a majority of sorts for continuation, but no consensus.
Metadata and summary are AI-extracted from the source PDF and reviewed for editorial accuracy. The original work is available via the Read PDF tab above (where present); paragraph-level citation inside the PDF is deferred to a future engagement.



