Skip to content
Indian Liberals
Filter:

Tip: search runs across all languages; results are tokenised per-page using the document's lang attribute. Search inside the documents →

letter

General Secretary's Letter to M.P.s No. 14

By N. Dandekar

Swatantra Party Central Office · Bombay 1 · 1967

1 pages

Summary

Dated October 16, 1967, this one-page letter from N. Dandekar, Officiating General Secretary of the Swatantra Party, conveys guidance approved by the Party’s Central Parliamentary Board and National Executive for the next session of Parliament. It asks the Party’s MPs to oppose any extension of the Reserve Bank of India’s powers that would interfere with the autonomous working of commercial banks, and to reject the proposed nationalisation of general insurance.

The letter also reiterates the Party’s opposition to monopolies and monopolistic practices in both the public and private sectors, while asking its parliamentary group to assess the Monopolies Bill on its merits and in light of Party policy. On language and education, it supports university autonomy, parental choice over the language of instruction, and parents’ freedom to choose schools rather than being confined by the neighbourhood-school concept. The document records a coordinated parliamentary position rather than a developed policy argument.

Key points

  • The Central Parliamentary Board reviewed the Swatantra Party’s recent parliamentary performance and anticipated issues for the next session.
  • The letter opposes extending Reserve Bank of India powers in ways that could interfere with commercial banks’ autonomous working.
  • The Party condemns the proposed nationalisation of general insurance.
  • The Party opposes monopolies and monopolistic practices in both the State and private sectors.
  • The Parliamentary Group is instructed to examine the Monopolies Bill in light of Party policy and on its merits.
  • The National Executive supports university autonomy and freedom to determine the medium of instruction.
  • Parents are to retain freedom to choose their children’s language of instruction and schools.

Metadata and summary are AI-extracted from the source PDF and reviewed for editorial accuracy. The original work is available via the Read PDF tab above (where present); paragraph-level citation inside the PDF is deferred to a future engagement.

People in this work

Related across the archive