Skip to content
Indian Liberals
Filter:

Tip: search runs across all languages; results are tokenised per-page using the document's lang attribute. Search inside the documents →

essay

Masani firm on quitting party posts

New Delhi · 1968

1 pages

Summary

A newspaper clipping dated May 14, 1968, reports that M. R. Masani had refused appeals from the Swatantra Party’s Central Parliamentary Board and National Executive to withdraw his resignation from both bodies. He had resigned in early April after the conduct of some Swatantra Party members during the Rajya Sabha election in Gujarat: six party MLAs reportedly disregarded the party leadership’s directive, fielded their own candidate against the official nominee, and helped that candidate win.

In a letter to the party’s general secretary, N. Dandekar, Masani reportedly described the disciplinary action initiated against the six members as “eyewash.” He argued that the party was developing the same cynicism about the sanctity of political pledges and the same contempt for the electorate that he associated with the Congress. Masani said he could do more for the party and democratic processes from outside its executive and parliamentary board, where he would also be free to express the suppressed feelings of rank-and-file members unhappy with the party’s condition.

Key points

  • M. R. Masani declined to withdraw his resignation from the Swatantra Party’s Central Parliamentary Board and National Executive.
  • His resignation followed an internal dispute over the conduct of Swatantra Party members during a Gujarat Rajya Sabha election.
  • Six party MLAs reportedly defied the party leadership’s directive and supported an unofficial candidate.
  • Masani described the disciplinary action against the members as inadequate or insincere.
  • He warned that the party was developing cynicism toward political pledges and contempt for the electorate.
  • He believed he could better advance democratic processes and the party’s principles from outside its formal executive bodies.

Metadata and summary are AI-extracted from the source PDF and reviewed for editorial accuracy. The original work is available via the Read PDF tab above (where present); paragraph-level citation inside the PDF is deferred to a future engagement.

Related across the archive