Skip to content
Indian Liberals
Filter:

Tip: search runs across all languages; results are tokenised per-page using the document's lang attribute. Search inside the documents →

letter

[Letter to Mr C Rajagopalchari]

By Minoo Masani

New Delhi · 1970

1 pages

Summary

This letter, dated 2 April 1970 and written by M. R. Masani to C. Rajagopalachari (“Rajaji”), seeks Rajagopalachari’s intervention in a Swatantra Party dispute. Masani reports that C. C. Desai is attempting to organise opposition to disciplinary action against him, including possible defections from the Gujarat Party and resistance to restoring party discipline. He argues that Desai’s standing in Gujarat derives from his campaign against the national leadership of the party and from his opposition to Indira Gandhi and her group.

Masani believes that a majority of the National Executive may support Desai’s expulsion, but says that the support of four members from Madras—Prof. Ruthnaswamy, Mariaswamy, Sundaram and Hindo—is important. He asks Rajagopalachari to attend the meeting or send a letter commenting on Desai’s statement, while stressing that the letter should be neutral rather than an outright opposition to Ranga. Masani also describes the practical difficulty of continuing with Desai in the party, citing the reluctance of supporters to face constituents who confront them over party policy and the Delhi treasurer H. P. Nanda’s refusal to help unless Desai is removed.

Key points

  • Masani writes to C. Rajagopalachari about proposed disciplinary action against C. C. Desai within the Swatantra Party.
  • He reports that Desai is seeking support against the National Executive and may provoke defections from the Gujarat Party.
  • Masani attributes Desai’s influence in Gujarat to his campaign against the party’s national leadership and against Indira Gandhi’s group.
  • He expects a possible majority for Desai’s expulsion but identifies four Madras members whose support may be decisive.
  • He asks Rajagopalachari to attend the relevant meeting or send a neutral letter commenting on Desai’s statement.
  • Masani argues that party workers cannot effectively defend the party while Desai remains a member, and cites H. P. Nanda’s refusal to assist under those circumstances.

Metadata and summary are AI-extracted from the source PDF and reviewed for editorial accuracy. The original work is available via the Read PDF tab above (where present); paragraph-level citation inside the PDF is deferred to a future engagement.

People in this work

Related across the archive