Skip to content
Indian Liberals
Filter:

Tip: search runs across all languages; results are tokenised per-page using the document's lang attribute. Search inside the documents →

essay

Dacoit menace

INDIAN EXPRESS · Bombay · 1972

1 pages

Summary

In the rendered page, Savitri Bajaj examines the continuing dacoit problem in the Chambal Valley and adjoining regions of Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh. The article argues that the menace has deep-rooted social and economic causes, including land hunger, unemployment, personal feuds and the absence of effective rehabilitation. It notes that earlier efforts associated with Acharya Vinoba Bhave and Jayaprakash Narayan had encouraged some dacoits to surrender, but argues that surrender alone cannot resolve the underlying problem.

In the rendered page, Bajaj stresses that surrendered dacoits must be dealt with under prevailing law while their families receive practical support, including possible access to land and other amenities. The article warns that idealistic appeals without a concrete rehabilitation programme could produce disillusionment and worsen the situation. Its central emphasis is that law enforcement and humane, workable governance must accompany moral persuasion.

Key points

  • The article links the Chambal dacoit problem to land hunger, unemployment, personal feuds and other deep-rooted causes.
  • It refers to surrender efforts connected with Acharya Vinoba Bhave and Jayaprakash Narayan.
  • Surrendered dacoits should be handled according to prevailing law.
  • Rehabilitation must address the needs of dacoits’ families, including land and other amenities.
  • Practical administrative measures are presented as necessary complements to idealistic appeals.
  • The article frames the issue as both a rule-of-law and governance problem.

Metadata and summary are AI-extracted from the source PDF and reviewed for editorial accuracy. The original work is available via the Read PDF tab above (where present); paragraph-level citation inside the PDF is deferred to a future engagement.

Related across the archive