Skip to content
Indian Liberals
Filter:

Tip: search runs across all languages; results are tokenised per-page using the document's lang attribute. Search inside the documents →

letter

[Letter to Jayaprakash Narayan]

By Minoo Masani

Lucknow · 1963

1 pages

Summary

In this letter dated 27 June 1963, Minoo Masani responds to Jayaprakash Narayan’s apparent concern about political parties. Masani acknowledges an aversion to parties but argues that, since parties exist, they can be brought together temporarily around an agreed programme. He stresses that the proposed unity is not primarily about seeking power, but about focusing public attention on policies and programmes of the government that he considers harmful and agitating for their modification or replacement.

Masani proposes a quiet meeting of friends to review the political situation and improve the tentative common programme. He is willing to invite Congressmen, though he doubts they will accept. The letter also frames peaceful political action as necessary but not passive: Masani argues that the world must find ways to oppose injustice and tyranny, and invokes Gandhi’s opposition to British imperialism as an example. He notes that C. Rajagopalachari (Rajaji) and he are especially interested in this question.

Key points

  • Masani accepts that political parties are an unavoidable feature of public life and proposes cooperation among them around a limited common programme.
  • He distinguishes the proposed unity from an immediate contest for political power.
  • The proposed programme is intended to expose and oppose government policies considered harmful to the nation.
  • Masani suggests a small, quiet meeting to review and improve the programme and discuss the political situation.
  • He supports peaceful means for addressing domestic and international problems while maintaining the need to oppose injustice and tyranny.
  • The letter invokes Gandhi’s resistance to British imperialism and identifies Rajaji and Masani as particularly interested in the question.

Metadata and summary are AI-extracted from the source PDF and reviewed for editorial accuracy. The original work is available via the Read PDF tab above (where present); paragraph-level citation inside the PDF is deferred to a future engagement.

People in this work

Related across the archive