Skip to content
Indian Liberals
Filter:

Tip: search runs across all languages; results are tokenised per-page using the document's lang attribute.

unclassified

M. Hidayatullah

Auto-created stub for M. Hidayatullah — surfaced by an interview or work that mentioned this figure. Editorial review pending.

How M. Hidayatullah is discussed in this archive

Referenced in 1 other work , including IL Explainer - Ep 6 | Why Are Fundamental Rights Not Amendable? .

In IL Explainer - Ep 6 | Why Are Fundamental Rights Not Amendable? : The episode opens with Justice Hidayatullah's Golak Nath ruling, which is the trigger for the entire Nath Pai / Meghrajji exchange, but he is not in the authority list.

Mentioned in (1)

Primary works (1)

  • IL Explainer - Ep 6 | Why Are Fundamental Rights Not Amendable? · 2022
    • "In a 1967 case, see Golak Nath versus the State of Punjab, Justice Hidayatullah, former Chief Justice of India, declared that it was — it was not within the powers of the Parliament to abridge or take away fundamental rights of a citizen." · Opening framing of the Golak Nath judgement.
    • "The guarantee is worthless if the rights are capable of being taken away." · Hidayatullah's reasoning quoted by the narrator.