Skip to content
Indian Liberals
Filter:

Tip: search runs across all languages; results are tokenised per-page using the document's lang attribute. Search inside the documents →

letter

GENERAL SECRETARY'S LETTER NO. 121

By Minoo Masani

Swatantra Party Central Office · Bombay · 1966

1 pages

Summary

This 4 June 1966 letter from M. R. Masani, General Secretary of the Swatantra Party, reports decisions of the Central Parliamentary Board concerning cooperation among democratic opposition parties. After noting that an attempted joint meeting had been postponed because of inadequate responses, the Board supports continuing bilateral talks for electoral adjustments while ruling out united fronts with non-Communist opposition parties and avoiding cooperation based on financial commitments.

The letter gives State Units freedom to negotiate mutual-assistance arrangements with other State parties and groups, subject to reciprocity and an explicit declaration of alignment. It proposes different manifesto arrangements for parliamentary and State Assembly candidates: Swatantra candidates for Parliament remain bound by the Party’s national manifesto, while State candidates may use locally acceptable manifestos that do not conflict with it. The Central Office requests regular reports on progress and insists that publicity be avoided.

Key points

  • The Central Parliamentary Board reviewed efforts to convene a joint meeting of democratic opposition parties.
  • Bilateral talks for electoral adjustments should continue.
  • United fronts with non-Communist opposition parties were ruled out.
  • Cooperation based on financial commitments was to be avoided.
  • National-level and State-level understandings should be negotiated with the relevant parties.
  • State Units could negotiate mutual-assistance arrangements on the basis of reciprocity.
  • Parliamentary candidates would remain bound by the Swatantra Party’s national manifesto, while State candidates could adopt compatible State manifestos.
  • Progress in negotiations was to be reported privately to the Central Office.

Metadata and summary are AI-extracted from the source PDF and reviewed for editorial accuracy. The original work is available via the Read PDF tab above (where present); paragraph-level citation inside the PDF is deferred to a future engagement.

People in this work

Related across the archive