Skip to content
Indian Liberals
Filter:

Tip: search runs across all languages; results are tokenised per-page using the document's lang attribute. Search inside the documents →

pamphlet

TIME TO SPEAK UP FOR THE UPPERDOG

3 pages

Summary

In this three-page pamphlet, Minoo Masani argues that India’s post-independence political economy has created a new “ruling class” through state-capitalist controls over industry, commerce, farming, and the movement of goods. He rejects the claim that the Swatantra Party represents only vested interests, contending that formerly privileged business and professional groups, former princes, peasants, workers, and the middle class have all become disadvantaged in different ways under an increasingly politicised economy. Masani presents the Swatantra Party as an advocate of free enterprise and private ownership against bureaucratic and political monopolies.

Masani attacks what he describes as the hypocrisy of politicians who speak of social justice while receiving generous allowances, contrasting this conduct with the material position of ordinary people. Drawing on Karl Marx’s concept of surplus value and Milovan Djilas’s analysis of the “new class,” he compares India’s ruling arrangements with communist systems in which political officials control nationalised property. The pamphlet concludes by calling on socialists to abandon opposition to existing vested interests and defend the “former upperdog” who has become the underdog under state capitalism.

Key points

  • Masani presents the Swatantra Party as a defender of groups disadvantaged by India’s state-capitalist system, rather than as a champion of vested interests.
  • He argues that political control has extended across industry, business, farming, and other areas of economic life.
  • The pamphlet identifies politicians, corrupt bureaucrats, and businessmen benefiting from state controls as elements of a new ruling class.
  • Masani criticises restrictions on production, imports, and enterprise as mechanisms that allow officials and connected interests to extract economic surplus.
  • He uses a parliamentary debate over lawmakers’ allowances to illustrate the gap between political rhetoric about social justice and official privilege.
  • Karl Marx and Milovan Djilas are invoked to frame the argument about surplus extraction and the emergence of a politically privileged “new class.”
  • The proposed remedy is a change of government, renewed free enterprise in industry and business, and vigorous peasant proprietorship of land.

Metadata and summary are AI-extracted from the source PDF and reviewed for editorial accuracy. The original work is available via the Read PDF tab above (where present); paragraph-level citation inside the PDF is deferred to a future engagement.

Related across the archive