Skip to content
Indian Liberals
Filter:

Tip: search runs across all languages; results are tokenised per-page using the document's lang attribute. Search inside the documents →

speech

LIBERALISM IN INDIA

By S. V. Raju

Mangalore · 2004

9 pages

Summary

This nine-page typed summary of S. V. Raju’s talk defines liberalism as a doctrine favoring a minimalist role for the state, while noting that the term has a different political meaning in the United States. Raju presents Indian liberalism as more than an economic or governance program: it rests on values, character, tolerance, human rights, and social justice. He argues that liberal principles have indigenous roots, recalling Mahatma Gandhi’s advocacy of minimum government and honoring M. R. Pai and B. R. Shenoy as prominent liberal figures associated with Mangalore.

The talk traces liberalism through the freedom struggle, the Indian Constitution, and parliamentary politics. Raju describes the Constitution as essentially liberal despite amendments restricting individual freedom, but criticizes the post-independence turn toward socialist economic planning and state control. He highlights the Swatantra Party as the principal parliamentary expression of liberalism from 1960 to 1974 and distinguishes economic liberalisation from liberal society, warning that intolerance, personality-based politics, corruption, and weak commitment to the rule of law remain serious problems. The concluding section presents the Indian Liberal Group’s role as promoting liberal economic policies and strengthening civil society.

Key points

  • The talk distinguishes the American use of “liberal” from the European and wider international meaning centered on limited government.
  • Raju defines liberalism through values including tolerance, human rights, social justice, and individual freedom, not economics alone.
  • Mahatma Gandhi, M. R. Pai, and B. R. Shenoy are presented as important reference points for Indian liberalism.
  • The freedom movement is described as having been led by liberal figures in the Indian National Congress until the shift from constitutional methods toward agitation.
  • The Indian Constitution is characterized as essentially liberal, even though later amendments restricted individual freedom.
  • Post-independence socialist planning and state control of the economy are criticized, with B. R. Shenoy’s dissent singled out.
  • The Swatantra Party is presented as liberalism’s principal parliamentary vehicle between 1960 and 1974.
  • Economic liberalisation is distinguished from social and political liberalism; the talk emphasizes intolerance, corruption, civil society, and the rule of law.

Metadata and summary are AI-extracted from the source PDF and reviewed for editorial accuracy. The original work is available via the Read PDF tab above (where present); paragraph-level citation inside the PDF is deferred to a future engagement.

People in this work

Related across the archive